• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About Us
    • What is BHT?
    • Aims & Objectives
    • People
  • Bembridge Harbour
    • Political History
    • Geography
    • Ecology
    • Sports & Activities
    • Working Harbour
    • Houseboat Community
    • Local History
  • News
  • Support Us
  • Contact

Bembridge Harbour Trust

Bembridge Harbour Trust - Isle of Wight

"To preserve and enhance Bembridge Harbour, its approaches and setting for the benefit of the public, including users of the Harbour and the communities of Bembridge and St Helens”

Letter to members January 2022

Dear Members,

Let’s hope for a brighter new year. The Trustee’s clear purpose in 2022 is to continue to strive for a sustainable future for Bembridge Harbour. The two main ongoing initiatives, the Judicial Reviews of the Bembridge Harbour Improvements Company Limited  ( as responsible Statutory  Harbour Authority (SHA)) and of the IWC ( as responsible Local Planning Authority) are likely to conclude within the year. We hope for positive outcomes for the harbour, it’s users and the communities that depend upon good and lawful decision making.  As a new year update please see this video where we set out some the issues the harbour faces now and how we seek progress.

Whilst the trustees see the issues clearly, with the help of expert advice, the SHA still cloud the issues with misinformation and resist the transparency that would show the reality of it’s financial management.

As an example, you may have seen Mr Thorpe’s letter in Isle of Wight County Press ( IWCP) 15th Jan. It is unclear what had prompted this, but he claims “that there appears to be confusion about submissions to Court by BHT ”. He says the matter is “straightforward”. Indeed it is, but not in the way he has set out in his letter, which contains many inaccuracies and is misleading.

BHT has decided not to respond with corrections in the IWCP. We don’t think it would be particularly helpful to engage in a ping-pong correspondence in that arena. Also, the law is clear about the extent to which it is permissible to publish information about ongoing litigation. Instead, we have decided to share a simple correction with our members, in case the letter has been read and caused any confusion about BHT’s position on these issues.

Taking the points in the order in which they appear in the letter.

  1. To be clear, the claim against the IWC has not been finally determined, it is awaiting a ruling in the Court of Appeal.
  2. Mr Thorpe says the developer BIL’s “costs are unpaid” – this implies BHT has not paid what was due, whereas the court has ordered that any costs will only become payable after a ruling from the Court of Appeal. (Similarly on the JR against the SHA: Any costs, either way, only become payable on the conclusion of JR process).
  3. Regarding the harbour company’s accounts, BHT has requested that these be published consistent with Government Guidance for Ports on openness and transparency. The previous harbour owner, Mr. Blatch, indeed published full accounts, until he used the harbour’s assets to secure the borrowings of his other companies, extracted large amounts and then became more secretive prior to being placed into Administration.
  4. Contrary to Mr Thorpe’s assertion, BHT’s trustees, including Jeremy Gully have personally donated thousands to the project.
  5. Yes, we have changed the barristers on the IOW JR so that the same two barristers are now handling both JRs. We note that Mr. Thorpe has similarly changed counsel.

Our AGM was held on the 21st December. Due to caution over Covid issues the trustees had decided to hold a zoom meeting rather than the preferred face to face format. Sadly, we had to postpone a presentation by Charlie White BSc(hons) of Portsmouth University on beach growth and erosion around the harbour entrance. All agenda motions, including the election of Trustees were passed unanimously and lively participation from an engaged audience reinforced the view that BHT were on the right track, despite the inevitable costs of legal action at this level.

Thanking all our supporters from inside and the growing number outside the Trust.

The Trustees

Chris Attrill, Jonathan Bacon, William Bland ,  Jeremy Gully (chair), Phil Jordan, Norman Marshall, Sara Smith, as Trustees

For and on behalf of

Bembridge Harbour Trust

Filed Under: Frequently asked questions, Letter to Members, News, Planning Update Tagged With: Bembridge Harbour, BHUG, Dredging, fundraisung, Groyne, Harbour Act, JR, Judicial review, Siltation

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Donate

Please make your donation to Bembridge Harbour Trust Lloyds A/C 00950539 sort code 309721.

If you are a UK tax payer please
complete the gift aid form.

Categories

  • Featured
  • Frequently asked questions
  • Letter to Members
  • News
  • Planning Update
  • Press Release
  • Uncategorised

Tags

aggregates AGM BASHHA bennett BHAG BHIC Ltd BHUG BI Ltd Co-op Community Court' DfT Dredging Ecology environment Environment Agency Fundraising fundraising planning fundraisung GMB Groyne Harbour Act Houseboats IWC IWCP JR JR Judicial Review Judicial review LDC legal Letter to Members LiDAR Love our Harbour maintenence management plan memebers update Natural England Planning Ports Good Governance Guidance Press Public Meeting S106 Sewage SHA Siltation

Footer

Correspondence Address

Secretary
Attrill and Sons (Isle of Wight) Ltd.
The Duver
Isle of Wight
PO33 1YB

Categories

  • Featured
  • Frequently asked questions
  • Letter to Members
  • News
  • Planning Update
  • Press Release
  • Uncategorised

Social Links

Copyright © 2023 · Bembridge Harbour Trust

Engineered by · Five57.com

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Accept